War and Military Atlas

How Battles Were Fought
Strategy and Doctrine

Blitzkrieg

BLITS-kreeg (German: lightning war)
Also Known As Lightning War
Modern, Nazi Germany

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Blitzkrieg (lightning war) is the term, popularized by wartime journalists rather than coined by the Wehrmacht itself, for the combined-arms method Germany used from 1939 to 1941: concentrating armor, motorized infantry and air power at a single decisive point to break through enemy lines, then encircling and destroying the resulting pocket rather than advancing on a broad, even front. A body of historiography, most prominently Karl-Heinz Frieser's The Blitzkrieg Legend (1995), argues that Germany never adopted blitzkrieg as a formal, codified operational doctrine, and that its early campaign successes owed as much to improvisation, local initiative and French and Polish mistakes as to any deliberate lightning-war theory.

The concentrated-armor breakthrough tactics Germany used from 1939 to 1941 are solidly documented; what is contested is whether the Wehrmacht itself ever held a codified doctrine called Blitzkrieg, or whether the label is a journalistic and postwar invention imposed on improvised, locally-driven successes. See the attached dissent.
Facts
Core Claim
Concentrate armor, motorized infantry and air power at one decisive point to break through, then encircle and destroy the enemy in the resulting pocket rather than pushing forward on a broad, even front. 1
Whether this was ever a single, codified doctrine rather than a retrospective journalists' label for improvised German successes is itself disputed; see the dissent record.
Origin Year
1939 1
The word itself appeared in German military writing as early as 1935, but its wide use dates to journalists' coverage of the 1939 invasion of Poland.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Auftragstaktik's decentralized command was one of the practices behind the speed of blitzkrieg operations.

Wehrmacht, Armed Forces and Units

Why this is disputed. Senior German officers and postwar historians dispute whether Blitzkrieg was ever an officially adopted doctrine of the Wehrmacht rather than ad hoc practice given a name after the fact; see the dissent record on this entity.

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Blitzkrieg
WikipediaDefinition section
Quote, Definition section
Blitzkrieg (lit. Lightning Warfare) is a German term used to describe a combined arms surprise attack, using a rapid, overwhelming force concentration.
View the Source
1. Wikipedia: Blitzkrieg
WikipediaMethods of operations sectionView the Source
1. Wikipedia: Blitzkrieg
WikipediaOrigin of term sectionView the Source
1. Wikipedia: Blitzkrieg
WikipediaEtymology and Historiography sectionsView the Source
1. Wikipedia: Blitzkrieg
WikipediaAssociated With: Wehrmacht, Opening section
Quote, Associated With: Wehrmacht, Opening section
the word Blitzkrieg was never used as an official military term by the Wehrmacht, except for propaganda, and it was never officially adopted as a concept or doctrine.
View the Source
Wikipedia: Mission-type tactics
WikipediaAssociated With: Auftragstaktik (Mission-Type Tactics)View the Source
Dissenting Readings (3 dissenting readings)
Core Claim

The word Blitzkrieg was never used as an official military term by the Wehrmacht except in propaganda, and it was never officially adopted as a concept or doctrine; senior German officers described the war-winning tempo of 1939 to 1941 as ad hoc solutions that emerged from the situation rather than a preplanned doctrine, and modern historians remain divided on whether it names a real, coherent method or a journalist's label applied after the fact.

A dissenting reading, from an independent laneWikipedia: Blitzkrieg, Wikipedia
Description

Frieser's The Blitzkrieg Legend (1995) argues that the Wehrmacht never adopted blitzkrieg as a codified operational doctrine and that no German field manual or general staff document of the period names or defines it; the term was coined by wartime journalists to describe the visible SPEED of the 1939 to 1941 campaigns, not a doctrine the German army itself planned around. On this reading, German successes owed more to superior operational-level improvisation, aggressive local initiative by individual commanders, and Allied command failures than to any unified lightning-war theory, and treating blitzkrieg as a settled, named doctrine overstates how deliberate and centrally planned the German approach actually was.

A dissenting reading, from Karl-Heinz Frieser and revisionist historiographyThe Blitzkrieg Legend (Frieser)
Description

Historians disagree on whether blitzkrieg was ever a real, codified Wehrmacht doctrine. J. P. Harris calls the term "a piece of journalistic sensationalism, a buzz-word with which to label the spectacular early successes of the Germans in the Second World War," and the article notes it "was never used as an official military term by the Wehrmacht, except for propaganda, and it was never officially adopted as a concept or doctrine." A competing, more conventional reading treats blitzkrieg as a real, if informally named, operational method: "modern historians use the term casually as a generic description for the style of maneuver warfare practised by Germany during the early part of World War II."

A dissenting reading, from an independent laneWikipedia: Blitzkrieg, Wikipedia
Frequently Asked Questions

Was Blitzkrieg a real, named German doctrine?

The tactics are well documented, but whether Germany held a codified doctrine by that name is genuinely disputed among historians.

The rapid, concentrated-armor breakthroughs Germany used from 1939 to 1941 are well documented, but whether the Wehrmacht itself held a codified doctrine called Blitzkrieg is disputed. Historian Karl-Heinz Frieser's The Blitzkrieg Legend (1995) argues the term was a wartime-journalist label applied after the fact, and that German successes owed as much to improvisation and local initiative as to any unified lightning-war theory; this atlas records that dissent alongside the entity's own description.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.